Author :
Abstract
Bilim ve teknolojideki sürekli ilerleme ile biz de daha fazla sorunla karşı karşıyayız. En büyük sorunlardan biri, malzemelerin, yani atık malzemelerin, sonlarına geldiğinde tahsisi veya ayrıştırılmasıdır. Bu çalışmada, döküm ve eritme prosedürlerinin bu araştırmada sıradan beton tuğlalar üzerindeki etkisini test etmek için plastik ve cam atıkların yanı sıra organik atıklar ve yumurta kabukları kullandık. Sonuçlara göre, çimento %10 ESP ve %20 GP ile değiştirildiğinde tuğla yoğunluğu ~%20'ye, kumda %25 plastik (PolySand Bricks) ile değiştirildiğinde ise %86'ya düşerken, tüm malzemelerin dayanıklılığı bileşimler ağır yük taşıyan tuğlalar kategorisine girdi (~%6). Ayrıca, %10 ESP esaslı tuğlalar maksimum basınç dayanımını (~%18) gösterirken, %25 Plastik ile değiştirilen PolySand tuğlaları (~%9) dayanıklılık gösterdi ve bu da onları kaldırımlarda kullanıma uygun hale getirdi.
Keywords
Abstract
With continuous progress in science and technology, we are facing more problems too. One of the biggest problems is the allocation or decomposition of materials when they come to their end i.e., the waste materials. In this study, we employed plastics and glass waste, as well as organic wastes, and eggshells, to test the influence of casting and melting procedures on ordinary concrete bricks in this research. As per the results, the density of the brick reduces to ~20% when the cement is replaced with 10% ESP and 20% GP and 86% when replaced with 25% plastic in the sand (PolySand Bricks), whereas the durability of all the compositions came under the heavy load-bearing bricks category (~6%). Furthermore, the 10% ESP-based bricks show the maximum compressive strength (~18%), whereas the 25% Plastic replaced PolySand bricks showed (~9%) strength, which makes them suitable for use in pavements.
Keywords
- [1] Anon, Dangerous Health Effects of Home Burning of Plastic Waste (2018).
- [1] Anon, Dangerous Health Effects of Home Burning of Plastic Waste (2018).
- mechanical properties of fired clay brick” Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3057–3062, 2016 doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.084
- [3] L. H. M. Vefago, and A. Jaume, "Recycling concepts and the index of recyclability for building materials." Resources, conservation and recycling 72, 127-135, 2013 doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.015
- [4] F. Pomponi, and M. Alice, "Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. " Journal of cleaner production 143 (2017): 710-718.
- [5] F. Pahlevani, and S. Veena, "From waste glass to building materials– An innovative sustainable solution for waste glass." Journal of Cleaner Production 191 192-206, 2018
- [6] Y. Jani and H. William, "Waste glass in the production of cement and concrete–A review." Journal of environmental chemical engineering 2,3 1767-1775, 2014
- [7] G.M.S. Islam, M. H. Rahman, and N. Kazi. "Waste glass powder as partial replacement of cement forsustainable concrete practice." International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 6,1 37-44, 2017[8] P. Soroushian, "Strength and durability of recycled aggregate concrete containing milled glass as partial replacement for cement." Construction and Building Materials 29, 368- 377, 2012
- [9] A.A. Aliabdo, A.M. Elmoaty and A.Y. Aboshama. "Utilization of waste glass powder in the production of cement and concrete." Construction and Building Materials 124, 866-877, 2016
- [10] N. J. Sowmya, "A Comparative Study on Egg Shell Concrete with Partial Replacement of Cement by Fly Ash." (2015).
- [11] N. Chadha, "A Partial Replacement of Cement Concrete with ESP & Glass." (2017).
- [12] P. Kumar, R. S. Vijaya and R. B. Jose. "Experimental study on partial replacement of cement with egg shell powder." International Journal of Innovation in Engineering and Technology 4, 334-341, 2015
- [13] M.N. Freire, J.G.S. Sidnei and J. N. F. Holanda. "Using eggshell waste in red wall tiles."Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management. Vol. 161. No. 1. ThomasTelford Ltd, 2008.
- [14] S. A. Raji, and A. T. Samuel. "Egg shell as a fine aggregate in concrete for sustainable construction." Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res 4,09 8-13, 2015
- [15] T. Subramani, and P. Sakthivel. "Experimental Investigation On Flyash Based Geopolymer Bricks." METHODOLOGY 5.5 (2016).
- [16] D Vinayaksubhash, B.A. Akram, B.S. Anil, K.K. Gopal, M.M Baraskar, "Brick manufacturing using non-biodegradable waste." International journal of engineering technology, management and applied science. Vol 5 Issue 4, April 2017.
- [17] M.J.Islam, M. S. Meherier, and AKM R. Islam. "Effects of waste PET as coarse aggregate on the fresh and harden properties of concrete." Construction and Building materials 125: 946-951, 2016
- [18] C. Albano, N. Camacho, M. Hernandez, A. Mattheus, A. Gutierrez, "Influence of content and particle sizeof waste pet bottles on concrete behavior at different w/c ratios." Waste Management 29,10: 2707-2716, 2009
- [19] S.A. Wahid, S,M. Rawi, and N. Md Desa. "Utilization of plastic bottle waste in sand bricks." Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research 5,1: 35-44 2015
- [20] D. Wiliński, L. Paweł and G. Rokicki. "Application of fibres from recycled PET bottles for concrete reinforcement." Journal of Building Chemistry 1,1: 1-9, 2016
- [21] K.S. Kumar and B.Kaliyamoorthy, "Recycling of E-plastic waste as a construction material in developing countries." Journal of material cycles and waste management 17,4: 718-724, 2015
- [22] K. Sahani, B.R. Joshi, K. Khatri, A,T. Magar, S. Chapagain, and N. Karmacharya. "Mechanical Propertiesof Plastic Sand Brick Containing Plastic Waste." Advances in Civil Engineering Article ID 8305670, 2022| doi:10.1155/2022/8305670
- [23] E. Schmaltz, E.C. Melvin, Z. Diana, E.F. Gunady, D. Rittschof, J.A. Somarelli, J. Virdin, and M. M.Dunphy-Daly. "Plastic pollution solutions: emerging technologies to prevent and collect marine plastic pollution." Environment International 144: 106067, 2020
- [24] O. Liu, J. Xiao, and A.Singh. "Plastic shrinkage and cracking behaviour of mortar containing recycled sand from aerated blocks and clay bricks." Sustainability 13, no. 3: 1096, 2021
